Economics Comedy Gold
The Chamber of Commerce's "Economic Impacts of Mandatory Sick Leave
Ordinance" report, which the Chamber stands behind except for the
quick morning whacks (quotes from the report in purpletext):
This is not the first instance where the City Council has mandated
policy on Madison businesses. (p. 4)
No kidding! Probably not the last, either.
Many social policy initiatives are promoted with less than perfect
information, or worse, are based on biased or selectively supportive
information bits. (p. 4)
Mr. Pot, meet Ms. Kettle.
In fact, the overall economic impact on Madison has not shown up
directly in the economic growth numbers. However, at the business
level the effects are real. (p. 4)
They're campaigning for the Purple Teardrop with Clutched Pearls
award, I see. Makes you wonder who's patronizing the new Jaguar dealer
(O.K., nobody, given their current product range, but you get the
point). The usual -- i.e., supported by the data -- story is that the
positive economic headlines have mainly reflected good times for
business interests and the rich who hold most of the equity, while
digging through the details shows conditions have been less favorable
for ordinary workers.
Other states have employee sick pay programs that are far less costly
and do not put businesses at a competitive disadvantage. For example,
California has a fund for worker sick wage relief that is funded by
employees. It costs each worker just $27 per year. (p. 6)
Hard to say what this refers to, in the absence of a citation, but I
guess it's the California Paid Family Leave insurance program. The
report doesn't mention that while the PFL program is useful, it's not
remotely equivalent to sick leave in that there's an unpaid waiting
period, routine illnesses are ineligible for coverage, and there's no
right to take leave.
Educate don't Legislate [sic] (p. 7)
Economists shouldn't try to channel the Rev. Jesse Jackson. Period.
[continuing directly] Mandatory benefits packages hurt progressive,
responsible companies by decreasing their competitive advantage of
flexible and responsive compensation offerings. Studies have shown
that giving employees time off for family wellness needs is cost
effective for the firm.
Darn that city for trying to force blockheaded business owners to take
away the competitive advantages of their more enlightened competitors!
No comments:
Post a Comment